DoHistoryArchivesite maptech helpabout sitesearch

Man-Midwifery Exposed and Corrected
Gregory, Samuel
1848
Published by George Gregory, New York
Location of original: Countway Rare Books, Harvard University
 
View thumbnails of the 25 pages in this document
 
View Image
View Image
 
<

Page 49

>

  AND CORRECTED 49
 
that there is not usually an exposure of person to the eye. Professor Bedford, in his edition of M. Chailly's Midwifery, says, 'I hold it to be a rule which the pupil should ever keep in memory, that the feelings of the patient are always to be sacredly regarded, and on no account should there be an unnecessary exposure of her person.' This rule, if observed, mitigates the impropriety a little, and but a little, and the immoral tendency of the occupation still remains. The professor's sacred regard for the feelings of patients would be better manifested by encouraging the education of midwives.
   Dr. Bedford's rule is very liable to be disregarded. Indeed, Dr. Gooch, another professor, says, "We can examine patients in humble life as we please." Mr. R., in a large town, some twenty miles distant, said an old doctor, late of that place, famous in midwifery, used to come joking into the lying-in room, and throw the lady's dress over her head with the utmost good humor. The young doctors, occasionally with him, were put to the blush; but it appears they have become less sensitive since, as two of them have made trouble in families , by improprieties. It would seem, too, that the freedom of this obtuse old man-midwife and the younger ones had depreciated the morals of the place, by making easy mothers and, consequently, easy daughters. For a physician there stated publicly, to show that doctors were no worse than the rest of the community, that in one case in thirteen the young married people there had an heir unlawfully soon after the wedding ceremony.
   As to exposures, Dr. Ramsbotham, in speaking of the Bandage, to be applied after the delivery, says, it should be fitted next to the skin, and be so wide as to reach from the pubes almost to the ensiform cartilage; and, thus requiring exposure, he thinks, 'that there is something highly indelicate in its being applied by a man,' and that it should be applied by the nurse; and that 'the nurse must know very little of her duties,' if she could not do it. On the contrary, Dr. McPheeters, in the St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, copied into the Boston M.&S. Journal, says, 'Too much attention cannot be paid to the subject of bandaging. In the first place, it should be applied and properly adjusted by the physician himself.' -- A doctor, in this city, recently attended a young woman, and applied the bandage. Afterwards, in conversation with another lady on delicate topics, he significantly remarked, that 'Mr. C.'s

wife was a very pretty woman.' It came back to Mr. C. and wife, that the doctor thought her a specimen of symmetrical beauty. They do not intend further to trouble curious doctors to do midwives' and nurses' work. Another doctor of this city visited a young woman, of 17, three days previous to her first confinement, and examined her each day. She felt wretchedly about it, wept, and asked the older women if such things were usual and necessary.
   When lecturing in Lynn, last fall, several of the citizens spoke before the audience, approving of my course, and corroborating my statements with additional facts. Among others, a gentleman, known in the literary world, said he thought the business should be in the hands of women; said a doctor there, on seeing a beautiful lady enceinte, passing in the street, elbowed a friend, and said, 'I shall like to attend that lady by and by, to see her handsome person.'
   Mrs. Ruth Stebbins, before spoken of, said the young doctors of Suffield, Ct., when speaking of attending the young wives on the first occasion, called it 'halter-breaking them.' And, rejoicing in their occupation, 'There,' they would say to each other, as they looked out into the street, 'there goes one that I halter-broke a few weeks ago -- and there, yonder comes another that I shall break in soon.' Suppress your indignation, reader, and go earnestly about correcting this libidinous system. -- Dr. K., of M., in this state, remarked to the publisher, that he had heard young physicians, in their confidential chats, boast of having committed adultery with women, when their husbands were in the house at the time. --The other professions together do not furnish a tithe of the minor and gross improprieties that grow out of the present medical practice. I have matter on this head sufficient for quite a volume. Yet, of course, comparatively little leaks out to the public, and but a small part of that would fall in the way of any one person. Well does Dr. Ewell call it 'the secret history of adultery.' When there grows up a 'mutual confidence, let me say affection,' other things follow naturally.
   Dr. A., from this city, located in the western part of the state, had an intrigue with the landlord's wife. The husband remained ignorant of it for some years. It came to his knowledge, crushed his spirit. He lived on a few years in wretchedness, and committed suicide. This system is the deadly Upas to domestic happiness. -- Dr. B., of Salem, hav-

<   >

 Title page   Page 5   Page 7   Page 8   Page 9 
 Page 10   Page 11   Page 12   Page 13   Page 14 
 Page 15   Page 16   Page 17   Page 18   Page 19 
 Page 20   Page 21   Page 22   Page 23   Page 46 
 Page 47   Page 48   Page 49   Page 50   Page 51 




home your interests who was Martha? Martha's diary book film doing history archive on your own