DoHistoryArchivesite maptech helpabout sitesearch

Man-Midwifery Exposed and Corrected
Gregory, Samuel
1848
Published by George Gregory, New York
Location of original: Countway Rare Books, Harvard University
 
View thumbnails of the 25 pages in this document
 
View Image
View Image
 
<

Page 21

>

21 MAN-MIDWIFERY EXPOSED  
 

two confinements. On the second occasion, though the physician was a kind and excellent man, a familiar in the family, yet such was the effect of his presence on his wife, that the progress of the labor was suspended, and it was impossible for the child to be born, until they requested the doctor to leave the room: then all went on to a speedy and succesful termination. Since then, he said, he had followed the dictates of nature and proprietry, and employed a midwife, as he had had occasion in several intances, and the consequence had been entire success, without any of the embarrassment and injurious effects of having a man about. 'O,' said he, with much feeling, 'there is no knowing how much delicate and sensitive women suffer mentally, and how much their bodily sufferings and dangers to life are increased, by the unnecessary and unnatural practice of employing men to officiate at childbirth.' He expressed a deep interest in the success of this enterprise of restoring the office to women.
I have never conversed with an editor who argued against the plan of instructing and employing midwives; indeed, it is an exceedingly rare thing to find a non-medical gentleman, in any class of society, who takes that ground. The only question in their minds is, Can male attendants be dispensed with, and females employed with safety? If this question can be satisfactorily answered in the affirmative, as it most assuredly can be, there would seem to be no insuperable obstacle in the way of an entire change of practitioners, and that too in no great length of time. Let us have, by legislative enactment and appropriation, or by private donation, an institution that shall afford a supply of thoroughly qualified female practitioners, according to the example of France and other countries. No one can doubt that this would be exceedingly gratifying to the public; and the medical profession would of course accommodate themselves to the new order of things. The supply is always regulated by the demand. If a smaller number of physicians should be needed, a smaller number of young men would turn their attention to that profession.

Man-midwifery in Boston in 1820.

INTERESTING RELIC.

'Remarks on the Employment of Females as Practitioners in Midwifery. By a Phy-

sician. Boston: Published by Cummings and Hilliard, 1820.'
Such is the title of a pamphlet of 24 octavo pages---a document of remarkable interest, not only on account of its contents, but from the circumstances which called it into existence.
The 'Physician' commences thus: 'The attention of the public having lately been turned to the subject of the employment of females as accoucheurs, has led to some discussion among the faculty and others with regard to the safety and expediency of midwifery instead of physicians.'
It may be interesting to the younger part of our population, and call up some reminiscences among the elder citizens, to have the history of an event which happened twenty-eight years ago. What, then, turned public attention to that subject, at that time? Here is the clew to the matter---an obituary notice in the Boston Liberator, of 1845, runs thus:---
'Mrs. Janet Alexander died in Boston, September 15, 1845, after an illness of nearly five months, aged 61 years. She was a native of Scotland, and was instructed in the theory and practice of midwifery by Dr. James Hamilton, the celebrated professor of midwifery in the University of Edinburgh. She received her diploma from him in 1817. She arrived in Boston in November, 1819, and commenced the exercise of her profession on the ensuing Christmas day; and, for a period of more than twenty-five years' practice among the most intelligent and respectable portion of the community, was most singularly successful, having never in any instance lost a patient!'
It is something of a coincidence, it may be remarked in passing, that this excellent and useful woman arrived here, with her diploma from high authority, just one century after that benefactress of her race, Mrs. Elizabeth Phillips, who arrived in 1719, 'commissioned by John, Lord Bishop of London, and, by the blessing of God, brought into this world above 3000 children.' How many centuries more is New England to depend on the 'Old Country,' for qualified and commissioned midwives?
The arrival of Mrs. Alexander, then, was the beginning of the troublous times, and 'discussion among the faculty.' But wherefore? They were not frightened by a woman, and she was a friendless stranger. No; but she was not entirely friendless; for two
<   >

 Title page   Page 5   Page 7   Page 8   Page 9 
 Page 10   Page 11   Page 12   Page 13   Page 14 
 Page 15   Page 16   Page 17   Page 18   Page 19 
 Page 20   Page 21   Page 22   Page 23   Page 46 
 Page 47   Page 48   Page 49   Page 50   Page 51 




home your interests who was Martha? Martha's diary book film doing history archive on your own