12 |
|
But it is to
be observed, I have hitherto argued upon the most disadvantageous ground,
for I have admitted the competency of females to the management of the
mechanical process of labour, when this is natural. I have so far gone
upon the supposition, that they were regularly educated, and had had experience
as accoucheurs. But a fairer, and for my purpose, a much stronger ground
on which to discuss the question, is upon the bare general principle,
of the common introduction of women to the practice of midwifery. I need
take no trouble to show that this must be the final result, if the custom
be once introduced among the higher circles of society; and if this is
the case, is it not obvious that the greater proportion must be unintelligent
and poorly educated, or rather not educated at all?
Heretofore, where midwifery has been in the hands of women,
they have only practised among the poorer and lower classes of people;
the richer and better informed preferring to employ physicians, and this
has been the reason why it has not become universal; but if it be again
introduced among the rich and influential, it will become fashionable;
it will be considered as indelicate and vulgar to employ a physician and
the custom will become general.
Now what man would be willing to confide the practice of midwifery
wholly to women? who would be willing to entrust his wife or his daughter
in their hands, if there were no possibility of calling for abler assistance
in cases of emergency? I venture to say scarce an individual would do
it. But we are to examine how the admission of female accou-
|
|
|
|