Martha Ballard's Story
Chapter 16

Martha's entries on Rev. Foster appear in a 1904 town history

About one third of Martha's diary appeared in the history of Augusta by Charles Nash, which was printed in 1904, but sat in crates in an old barn, unbound, until 1961. This excerpt shows how Nash cut out the more shocking details Martha recorded. Martha's October 1, 1789 entry about Rebecca Foster swearing a rape against Judge North ("Shocking Indeed.") is included but Judge North's name is blanked out. The longest entry in her diary from December 23, 1789, where she describes what Rebecca Foster told her, has been totally cut. And Martha's account of the 1790 trial in Pownalboro has been whittled down to just the July 6 entry which mentions her trip getting to Pownalboro. Her assesment of the trial and the court's verdict on July 12 do not appear. In his diary abridgement, Nash included Martha's entries on Isaac Foster's controversy with the town. But Martha's description of the North rape trial was totally omitted.

The official history of Augusta, written by Judge North's grandson, also fails to mention the rape trial.



previous
The verdict of the Supreme Judicial Court
     
next
What happened to Isaac and Rebecca Foster after the rape trial? Does Martha's diary give us clues?

Table of Contents

The History of Augusta
Nash, Charles Elventon
1904
View Text
View Text
View Frames version

 

 

Page 293

 

The History of Augusta Page 293. Choose 'View Text' (at top) for faster download.